Nope. DD is RF and will remain RF til our seat maxes out. It was the plan from the get-go. I posted this on FB and I think I upset a few friends (whose kids are well above 2 anyway) because they turned their kids much earlier and claim that no way would the kid fit RF. Well, yes, DD has to cross her legs or bend her knees (depending on the car) but she's fine. If a car seat prevents you from driving safely, then move the location, get a different seat, or change the primary vehicle for the child's transportation.
This has been the advice of car seat tech installers for quite a while (I think this is not currently law. That remains 1 yr AND 20 lbs, something people still don't take seriously sometimes). Longer RFing was mentioned to me when DD was born and again when we had them check our convertible seat. Quite simply the data shows that little kids travel more safely RF for longer. Personally, I would rather my child potentially break a leg before her neck.
I'm also glad that the seats are getting higher limits (straps and weight) in general, and that companies like Babies R Us have "trade in" days where parents can take an unsafe seat and get % off for a new, safe one. We bought our seat on sale and it will serve her til she is 65 lbs (if she doesn't outgrow in height...of course a year later the limits got higher, but we'll cross that when we get there), which is a long time. If you wanted, you could skip the carrier in the first place and buy a convertible from the start. Most will hold a baby from 5lbs.